Author
Returns beyond RevPAR: total value metrics that matter
Your RevPAR is up. So why aren’t your returns?
Let’s be direct: RevPAR is a useful number. It tells you how efficiently you’re filling rooms and at what price. But if you’re using it to make decisions about refinancing, capital expenditure, or exit timing, you’re looking at the wrong dashboard.
A hotel can post record RevPAR and still leave its owner with deteriorating cashreturns. How? Because everything that sits between rooms revenue and actual money in ownership’s pocket — labour costs, energy bills, franchise fees, debt service, deferred capex, covenant obligations — sits entirely outside RevPAR. The metric doesn’t see any of it.

The past three years have made this problem impossible to ignore. Between March 2020 and August 2023, the Bank of England base rate moved from 0.10% to 5.25%. That’s not a rounding error — it’s a fundamental repricing of hotel investment economics. The same asset, the same RevPAR, the same operator can now produce materially weaker equity returns simply because the cost of the debt sitting beneath it has tripled.
“The cost of capital has fundamentally reshaped hotel underwriting over the past two years. The same operating performance now translates into very different equity outcomes depending on financing structure.”
— CoStar market commentary
This quarter’s Hospitality InnSights white paper — co-published by InnPractice and Accommodate Consulting — introduces a framework built around three interconnected dimensions: cash today (distributable cash flow after debt service and capex), value tomorrow (exit value sensitivity to sustainable net operating income and market yields), and resilience (downside protection through break-even occupancy and covenant headroom).
These aren’t abstract concepts. They’re the questions a lender, a buyer, or a board should be asking — and that operators and asset managers should be able to answer. If your monthly reporting can’t bridge from RevPAR to cash conversion to valuation sensitivity, you’re flying partially blind.
The paper also identifies the traps that cause even experienced operators to misread performance: mixing VAT-inclusive and exclusive ADR figures, treating short-run event distortions as structural trends, ignoring capex timing in return calculations, and — critically — assuming the cost of financing is a constant when it demonstrably isn’t.
None of this means RevPAR stops mattering. It means it needs context. London hotels commanded an ADR premium of roughly £28 over regional England in July 2025 — a gap that has significant implications for structure choice and exit assumptions that RevPAR alone doesn’t surface. The metric is the start of the conversation, not the end of it.
The full paper sets out a practical owner scorecard across five categories — trading, cost flow-through, cash, capital, and risk — and a decision map linking structure choices (lease, management, franchise) to the measures that should drive them. It closes with a staged implementation roadmap that can be embedded into monthly governance within 12 weeks.
If your RevPAR is up but your returns feel flat, this paper is worth your time.
